ࡱ> vu ZO\pESC Ba==xD48X@"1Arial1Arial1Arial1Arial1Arial1Arial1Arial1Arial1" Bodoni MT1" Bodoni MT1hArial1Arial1Arial1Arial1Arial1Calibri1 Calibri1Calibri14Calibri1 Calibri1Calibri1Arial1Calibri1,8Calibri18Calibri18Calibri1 Arial1>141<Calibri1?Calibri1h8Cambria1Calibri1 Calibri"$"#,##0_);\("$"#,##0\)!"$"#,##0_);[Red]\("$"#,##0\)""$"#,##0.00_);\("$"#,##0.00\)'""$"#,##0.00_);[Red]\("$"#,##0.00\)7*2_("$"* #,##0_);_("$"* \(#,##0\);_("$"* "-"_);_(@_).))_(* #,##0_);_(* \(#,##0\);_(* "-"_);_(@_)?,:_("$"* #,##0.00_);_("$"* \(#,##0.00\);_("$"* "-"??_);_(@_)6+1_(* #,##0.00_);_(* \(#,##0.00\);_(* "-"??_);_(@_)"Yes";"Yes";"No""True";"True";"False""On";"On";"Off"],[$ -2]\ #,##0.00_);[Red]\([$ -2]\ #,##0.00\)                                                                      ff + ) , *      P  P         `           ! a> " ( 0@ @                 8@ @ 0@ @ 0@ @ 0!@ @ 0@ @ 0!@ @  8@ @ 0!@ @ 0!@ @ (0!@ @ 0@@  p@ @  p@ @  p@@  p!@ @  p@ @  p@ @   x!@ @  8@ @  8@@  8@ @  8@ @  8@ 0@ 0!@  8!@ @  8!!@ @  8@@   x@@   x!@ @  8@ @  8!@@  p@ @   p@ @   8!@ @  8!@ @  4@ @   <@ @  p!@ @   x@ @   x@@   x!@ @   x!@ @   x!@@  p!@ @  0@ @ 0@ @ 0!@ @   <@ @ p@ @   x@@  p@ @  p@@   8@ @ 0@  8@ p!@   8  8 0  (  x ||n\}A} 00_)ef[$ -}A} 00_)ef[$ -}A} 00_)ef[$ -}A} 00_)ef[$ -}A} 00_)ef[$ -}A} 00_)ef [$ -}A} 00_)L[$ -}A} 00_)L[$ -}A} 00_)L[$ -}A} 00_)L[$ -}A} 00_)L[$ -}A} 00_)L [$ -}A} 00_)23[$ -}A} 00_)23[$ -}A} 00_)23[$ -}A} 00_)23[$ -}A}  00_)23[$ -}A}! 00_)23 [$ -}A}" 00_)[$ -}A}# 00_)[$ -}A}$ 00_)[$ -}A}% 00_)[$ -}A}& 00_)[$ -}A}' 00_) [$ -}A}( 00_)[$ -}}) }00_)[$ -##0.  }}* 00_)[$ -???##0.??? ??? ???}-}/ 00_)}(}0  00_)}A}1 a00_)[$ -}A}2 00_)[$ -}A}3 00_)?[$ -}A}4 00_)23[$ -}-}5 00_)}(}6  00_)}}7 ??v00_)̙[$ -##0.  }A}8 }00_)[$ -}A}9 e00_)[$ -}x}:00_)[$##  }}; ???00_)[$???## ???  ??? ???}-}= 00_)}U}> 00_)[$## }-}? 00_)}(}o00_)}(}p00_)}(}q00_)}(}r00_)}(}s00_)}(}t00_)}(}y00_)}(}z00_)}(}{00_)}(}|00_) 20% - Accent1M 20% - Accent1 ef % 20% - Accent2M" 20% - Accent2 ef % 20% - Accent3M& 20% - Accent3 ef % 20% - Accent4M* 20% - Accent4 ef % 20% - Accent5M. 20% - Accent5 ef % 20% - Accent6M2 20% - Accent6  ef % 40% - Accent1M 40% - Accent1 L % 40% - Accent2M# 40% - Accent2 L渷 % 40% - Accent3M' 40% - Accent3 L % 40% - Accent4M+ 40% - Accent4 L % 40% - Accent5M/ 40% - Accent5 L % 40% - Accent6M3 40% - Accent6  Lմ % 60% - Accent1M 60% - Accent1 23 % 60% - Accent2M$ 60% - Accent2 23ږ % 60% - Accent3M( 60% - Accent3 23כ % 60% - Accent4M, 60% - Accent4 23 % 60% - Accent5M0 60% - Accent5 23 %! 60% - Accent6M4 60% - Accent6  23 % "Accent1AAccent1 O % #Accent2A!Accent2 PM % $Accent3A%Accent3 Y % %Accent4A)Accent4 d % &Accent5A-Accent5 K % 'Accent6A1Accent6  F %(Bad9Bad  %) Calculation Calculation  }% * Check Cell Check Cell  %????????? ???+ Comma,( Comma [0]-&Currency.. Currency [0]/Explanatory TextG5Explanatory Text %0 F Followed Hyperlink   1Good;Good  a%2 Heading 1G Heading 1 I}%O3 Heading 2G Heading 2 I}%?4 Heading 3G Heading 3 I}%235 Heading 49 Heading 4 I}%64 Hyperlink   7InputuInput ̙ ??v% 8 Linked CellK Linked Cell }% 9NeutralANeutral  e%"Normal :Noteb Note   ;OutputwOutput  ???%????????? ???<$Percent =Title1Title I}% >TotalMTotal %OO? Warning Text? Warning Text %XTableStyleMedium9PivotStyleLight16`![2024 Rad. Assessment Plan  ; 5 HGoal 1: Students will be able to perform as an entry-level radiographer. BenchmarkMeasurement Tool and TimeframeResponsibilityResultsLearning OutcomeJ2. Students will demonstrate appropriate judgment in the clinical setting.FGoal 3: Students will effectively communicate with patients and staff.RTE 1613 instructor.^Goal 4: Students will understand the value of professional development and life-long learning./Career Plan in RTE 2061 -- summer, second year.RTE 2061 instructor?Written assignment in RTE 2473 -- spring semester, second year.RTE 2473 instructor.Program Outcome/2. Graduates will find employment in the field.A3. Graduates will indicate overall satisfaction with the program.;4. Students starting the program will complete the program.75. Employers will indicate satisfaction with graduates.Program Effectiveness Goals Radiologic Technology ProgramRTE 2782 instructor."Florida SouthWestern State CollegeQ1. Students will communicate both orally and in writing in a professional manner.Clinical Coordinator,Clinical Coordinator and Clinical PreceptorsProgram Director)Program Director and Clinical Coordinator0Competency Evaluations -- End of Summer semesterAnnual ResultsqThis goal has been met. For the past five years, the employent rate has not dropped more than 6% year-over-year.GAnnual employment rates will not decrease more than 10% year-over-year.bCompletion rates will not decrease more that 10% in two consecutive years within the 5-year cycle.TrendsCorrective ActionsSThe program completion rate will be 70% or greater averaged over a five-year period80% of responding employers will indicate that graduates are competent and perform as expected. (Agree or strongly agree with question 14 on the Employer Survey);6. Graduates will consider themselves clinically competent.Y1. Students will understand the value of professional development and life-long learning.90% of second-year students will successfully perform a minimum of 3 radiographic competencies on actual geriatric patients by the end of the fall semester.A1. Graduates will pass the ARRT national certifying examination. hEach year, at least 90% of program graduates will pass the ARRT certifying exam on the first attempt. 9ARRT results for graduate cohort-- annually in September.An average of 90% of graduates will pass the ARRT certifying examination on the first attempt over a five-year period. zTrending of pass rates over 5 years reveal a range of 92-100% but are consistently greater than the established benchmark.W90% of those graduates seeking employment will find jobs within one year of graduation.L;Employer Inquiry and graduate response annually in October.BQuestion 14 on the 6-month Graduate Survey -- annually in February~The number of graduates rating the program's overall satisfaction as excellent will not decrease more that 25% year-over-year.)Program statistics -- annually in OctoberDEmployer Survey -- Question #14 every other year in spring semester.4Graduate Survey Question #12 -- annually in FebruaryLSecond semester skills evaluations -- Annually, End of First Spring SemesterGClinical Competency Evaluations -- Annually, End of First Year Summer C2. Students will apply age specific variations and competencies in using proper patient care skills and positioning techniques. ?Clinical Competency Evaluations --Annually End of Fall semesterSGoal 2: Students will demonstrate critical thinking through problem solving skills.CClinical Competency Evaluations -- Annually, End of Spring SemesterDuring trauma competencies in the spring semester of the second year, 90% of students will be rated as successful on Properly Evaluates Patient Condition and Alters Patient Position Appropriately (item 8) on the clinical competency evaluation. HClinical Competency Evaluation Form -- Annually, end of spring semester@Clinical Coordinator and Clinical Preceptors and Clinical Staff.Employer repondents will Agree or Strongly Agree to the statement "Exercises independent judgement and discretion in the technical performance of medical imaging procedures" (question 8) on the Employer survey at least 90% of the time.BEmployer Survey -- every other year 6 months following graduation.GOral presentation in RTE 2782 -- annually Spring Semester, second year.PWritten research assignment in RTE 1613 -- annually spring semester, first year.Y2. Students will effectively communicate with patients and staff in the clinical setting.OWeekly Student Performance Evaluation -- Annually, end of first Spring SemesterStudents in the second spring semester will average a rating of 2 (out of 3) or higher on question #2 focused on communication with clinical staff on 2 different Weekly Clinical Performance Evaluation and midpoint and end of clinical course.PWeekly Student Performance Evaluation -- Annually, end of second spring SemesteruStudents will attain a grade of 80% or higher on a written assignment in RTE 2473 on the value of life-long learning.Students will receive a satisfactory "pass" grade on a career plan created in their final semester in RTE 2061 that includes plans for further professional development.Percentage of students who earned a "pass" grade for the career plan assignment: 2023: 100% (n=12). 2022: 100% (n=19), 2021: 100% (n=22).2. Students will understand the value of continued professional development and further education following program completion (i.e. further imaging certification or cross-training).GGraduate Survey -- 6 months following graduation, annually in February.'Program Effectiveness Goals (continued)90% of second-year students will successfully perform a chest competency on an actual pediatric patient by the end of the spring semester.90% of second-year students will achieve a score of 3.0 (out of 3.0) on item 9 (Good Judgement) of their Final PDA for the spring semester.Percent of second-year students receiving a score of 3 on item 9 of the spring Final PDA: 2024 = 94.1% (n=17), 2023 = 92.3% (n=13), 2022 = 100% (n=19), 2021 = 100% (n-23)In fall 2024, the program faculty determined that the previous measurement tool (Weekly Student Evaluations) were not reliable and did not accurately reflect the students' ability to show clinical judgement. It was recommended by the faculty and approved by the Advisory Committee to use the "Good Judgement" criteria on the Final PDA as a measurement tool. The students have consistantly demonstrated good judgement in the clinical setting IFinal Personal Development Assessment - Annually, end of spring semester.2024 - 100% (17 of 17) of second-year students successfully performed 3 or more radiographic competencies on geriatric patients during fall semester. pin 2024, 94.1% of second-year students successfully performed a chest competency on an actual pediatric patient.Percent of students performing a chest competency on an actual pediatric patient: 2024 - 94.1% (n=17), 2023 - 100% (n = 12), 2022 - 100% (n = 19), 2021 95% (21 or 22). s2024 - 100% (n=17) were able to properly identify necessary position alterations and recommend appropriate actions._In 2024, 94.1% (16 of 17) students received a score of 3.0 on item 9 on their spring Final PDA.Students will attain an 85% or higher on an oral presentation conducted in the classroom setting during spring semester of second year, RTE 2782.Students will attain an 85% or higher on a written research assignment conducted in the classroom setting during spring semester of first year, RTE 1613Students in the first spring semester will average a rating of 3 (out of 4) or higher on question #1 focused on patient communication on 2 different Weekly Clinical Performance Evaluation and midpoint and end of clinical course. i2024: 100% of students averaged a rating of 2 or higher for question #2 (average rating of 3.0) (n= 17). Percentage of students who averaged a rating of 3 or higher for question #2: 2024 - 100% (average rating: 3.0) (n=17), 2023 - 100% (average rating: 2.95) (n=13), 2022 - 100% (av< erage rating: 3.0) (n=19), 2021 - 100% (n=23).The average graduate pass rate over 5 years (2020 - 2024) was 97.6% (81 of 83 graduates passed the ARRT Certifying Exam on the first attempt).9ARRT results for graduate cohort-- annually in February. The scaled score for any section of the ARRT Certification Exam will be within 0.1 points of the nation section average each year.Exam results from 2019 to 2023 were reviewed by section and compared to the national average year over year. 98% (39 of 40) sections across each exam for this review period were within 0.1 points of the national average. National data for the ARRT for 2024 is not yet available. W100% of the 2024 graduates seeking employment in the field found a job within one year.QEmployment rates: 2024 - 100%, 2023 - 100%, 2022 - 100%, 2021 - 100%, 2020 - 100%DEmployer Inquiry and graduate response annually in January and June.]Employment rates: 2024 - 100%, 2023 - 100%, 2022 - 100%, 2021 - 100%, 2020 - 100%, 2019 - 94%Employment rates for review period 2019-2024 ranged from 94-100% as reported by current employers of program graduates and/or the graduate themselves. _Students will pass all second-semester skills evals in RTE 1513L with a grade of 75% or higher.j2024 - 100% (19 of 19) of students passed their second-semester skill evals with a grade of 75% or greaterr2024 - 100% (19 of 19), 2023 - 92.3% (24 of 26), 2022 - 100% (14 of 14), 2021 - 100% (18 of 18) met the benchmark.Students will successfully perform required competencies with a grade of 85% or better by the end of the first summer semester.u2024- 63.1% (12 of 19) of enrolled students passed all required competencies by the end of the first summer semester.Students obtaining a grade of 85% or higher on all required competencies: 2024 = 63.1% (n=19), 2023 =100%, (n = 26), 2022 = 100% (n = 13), 2021 = 91% (n = 20 of 22). In 2024, this benchmark was not met. 7 of 19 students did not attain all required competencies during the given timeframe. These data may not represent a trend as 5 of the 7 students attained 30 competencies, one student attained 29, and one student attained 28.=In 2024, the number of students performing all required competencies was considerably reduced, It is the opinion of the faculty that having three Radiologic Technology programs in the immediate area and multiple programs in all of the clinical sites has greatly reduced the opportunities for showing competency. All required competencies have been completed prior to graduation, however it has taken a greater length of time than in the past. The program has and will continue to monitor the number and variety of exams available to students in the clinical environment.1. Students will identify the proper corrective actions to create quality images while meeting the individual needs of the patient.O2024- 94.1% of students (n=16 of 17) passed the written assignment in RTE 1613.Percent of students receiving a grade of 85% or higher on the oral presentation: 2024 = 94.1% (n=17), 2023 = 100% (n=12), 2022 = 94.7% (n=19). In 2024, one student received a grade of 82% (class average was 94%) TPercent of students receiving a grade of 85% or higher: 2024 = 94.1% (n=7) 2023 = 96.1% (n=26), 2022 = 100% (n=14), 2021 = 100% (n=18), 2020 = 96% (n=27), 2019 = 81.3 (n=16)%. With the exception of 2019, the students have consistently demonstrated a high skill level in written communication evidenced by assignment scores greater than 85%. iIn 2023, the Ƶ scaled score for the section " Patient Care and Management (PC)" was 7.9 and the national scaled score was 8.2. These data were analyzed and it was determined that a lack of consistency in instruction was a contributing factor. In 2024, a veteran instructor was hired by the program to teach Patient Care. The program feels that the knowledge and leadership of this instructor will help insure that the Ƶ section score will meet or exceed the national score. Additionally, the Patient Care and Management section of the Registry Review classes has been strengthened and those skills emphasized.Percentage of students who averaged a rating of 3 or higher for question #1: 2024 - 94.7% (average: 3.39), 2023 - 100% (average rating: 3.58) (n=26), 2022 - 100% (average rating: 3.50) (n=14), 2021 - 100% (average rating: 3.44) (n=18). The percentage of students achieving a rating of 3 or higher has consistantly been maintained at 100%. The average ratings for question #1 has increased each of the past three years.k2024: 94.7% of students averaged a rating of 3 or higher for question #1 (average rating of 3.32) (n = 19).In 2024, one student received a rating of 2 on both Weekly Performance Evaluations tabulated. Remediation with this student was attempted for two semesters, but the student eventually failed in Fall 2024.Percentage of students achieving a minimum of 80% for the image evaluation section: 2024 - 95% (n=17), 2023 - 83% (10 of 12), 2022 - 84% (17 of 19), 2021 - 95% (21 of 22).Beginning in 2023, following data analysis, a greater emphasis was placed on radiographic anatomy and image analysis in the Positioning lab. The results were evident in the increase in the percentage of students that maintained an 80% or higher (from 83% to 95%). Further restructuring of the labs was completed in AY 2024-25. Any additional changes in this benchmark will be monitored in 2025. A2024- 94.1% (n=17) earned 85% or higher on the oral presentation.In 2024, the completion rate dropped 31% and the results were analyzed. Seven of the non-completers failed RTE 1523 in their first summer semester. KThe instructor for the Positioning classes was changed in the summer 2024 semester from an inexperienced one to an instructor with over 30 years of experience. It is believed that this change will reduce the number of non-completers in the future and the program will not have a decrease of more that 10% in two consecutive years.2024: 100% of students (n= 17) earned an 80% or higher grade for the written assignment focused on the value of life-long learning.Percentage of students who earned an 80% or higher grade for the written assignment focused on the value of life-long learning: 2024: 100% (n=17), 2023: 100% (n=12). 2022: 100%.Individual scores for each criterion area will be examined closely beginning in 2025 to determine if any particular criterion areas have average student scores below 80%. Subsequent corrective action will be determined accordingly.U2024: 100% of students (n= 17) earned a "pass" grade for the career plan assignment. Ongoing as needed. Beginning in summer 2025, career plans will be reviewed and proposed professional pathways will be categorized to determine the student areas of interest.50% of graduates will indicate a desire to continue professional development and/or further their education on question 17 of the Graduate Survey. /Graduate Survey, 6 months following graduation.This goal has been met. With three Radiologic Technology programs in the immediate area, the program will closely monitor these data to assure that the workforce needs are being met.Two graduates (one in 2021 and one in 2023) have failed the exam over the past five years. The program feels that this is within acceptable limits, but will continue reviewing 5-year data.e1. Students will produce diagnostic quality images and perform radiographic procedures appropriately.Percent of students performing a minimum of 3 geriatric procedures: 2024 - 100% (n=17), 2023 - 100% (n = 12), 2022 - 100% (n = 19), 2021 - 100% (n = 22). Benchmark for year over year comparisons was met. It 2023, the benchmarks were determined to be in decline, but have rebounded in 2024.This outcome has been met, however with multiple programs at all clinical sites, the program needs to monitor these data closely.Individual scores for each criterion area will be examined closely beginning in 2025 to determine if any particular criterion areas have average student scores below 85%. Subsequent corrective action will be determined accordingly.50% of graduates within 6 months of pro< gram completion will indicate, on the Graduate Survey (question 16), that they are interested in pursuing additional ARRT certifications.UThere are continued efforts to secure additional survey responses of graduates during the spring, 2024 semester. Areas of interest for certification or continued education will be compiled and associated areas within the curriculum will be enhanced if needed to align with graduate preference areas that align with industry workforce needs.eIn 2024, 100% of employers rated graduates as "Well Prepared" as an entry-level technologist. (n = 6)Percent of employers that indicated that they strongly agree with question 14 by year are as follows: 2024: 100% (n=6), 2023: 100% (n = 4), 2021: 100% (n=4), 2019: 100% (n=2). Normally, the program surveys the employers every two years, however, in 2024, the program asked for an out-of-cycle survey. These data again demonstrated a strong indication that the employers are highly satisfied with the performance of the program's graduates. Percent of graduates rating their clinical preperation as well or adequate (question 12): 2024 - 100% (average = 4.62) (n=8), 2023- 100% (average = 4.67) (n=8), 2022 - 100% (average = 4.86) (n=8), 2021 - 100% (average = 4.00) (n=2), 2020 - 100% (average = 4.33) (n=3).90% of graduates will report 6 months after program completion that they felt the program prepared them clinically for a job as an entry level radiographer. (Measured as a 4 out of 5 or higher on question 12 on the 6-month Graduate Survey)In 2024, 100% of graduates rated themselves as well or adequately prepared clinically as an entry level radiographer (average = 4.62 out of 5).The lower average scores in 2020 and 2021 were analyzed. Even though the benchmark was met each year, the lower average rating can be attributed to a low number of returned surveys possibly due to COVID. Since 2022, the program has made a conserted effort to obtain a higher response rate and the response rate has been consistently better. The program will continue to strive for as great an response rate as possible.90% of graduates will rate the overall satisfaction with the program as good or excellent on question 14 of the program graduate survey completed 6 months after graduation. }100% of 2024 responding graduates rated the overall satisfaction and effectiveness of the program as good or excellent (n=8).2024 - 100% (Average = 4.75) (n=8), 2023 - 100% (Average = 4.87) (n=8), 2022 - 100% (Average = 4.75) (n=8), 2021 - 100% (Average = 5.00) (n=2), 2020 - 100% (Average = 4.67) (n=3)2024 - Excellent = 75%, Good = 25% (n=8), 2023 - Excellent = 88%, Good = 22% (n = 8), 2022 - Excellent = 75%, Good = 25% (n = 8), 2021 - Excellent = 100% (n = 2), 2020 - Excellent = 67%, Good = 33% (n = 3). From 2021 to 2022, there was a 25% decrease in the Excellent rating. It was determined that this was mainly due to a very low number of responses in 2021 (n=2) possibly due to COVID. Since 2022, the rating of Excellent has not varied more than 13% year-over-year.eIn 2024, 50% (n=8) of respondants indicated a desire to further their education following graduation./This benchmark remains fairly consistant (with the exception of 2023), however the program does not feel that using this question has a strong link to the graduates value of continuing education. An alternative way to assess the graduates' value of continuing education is being reviewed and discussed.xIn 2024, 75% of graduate respondents (n=8) indicated that they are interested in pursuing additional ARRT certification.NPercent of graduate respondents indicating the desire to persue further ARRT certifications: 2024= 75% (n=8), 2023 = 50% (n = 8), 2022 = 88% (n = 8), 2021 = 100% (n = 2). A decline in 2023 and a corresponding increase in 2024 were noted. The program feels that these numbers are somewhat skewed due to the low survey response rate.Program Coordinator2Program Assessment Cycle: August 2024 to July 2025*In fall 2024, the program redesignated labs as separate courses with a single instructor along with an associate. Additionally, the labs were extended from 2 hours per week to 3. These changes have shown that student understanding and retention of positioning and technical skills have improved. LIn 2024, one student needed to complete this competency on a simulated patient due to inability to access a pediatric patient in clinical. In 2022, rotational assignments were altered so that all students would have a greater chance to show competency on an actual pediatric patient. The program has been closely tracking the number of successful pediatric radiographic competencies per student by the end of the spring semester of the second year. It has been determined that pediatric patient exams have become less available due to multiple programs' students at each clinical site.Students will maintain a minimum of 80% on the Image Evaluation (satisfactory for 4 of 5 criterion) portion of all competencies in the spring semester of the second year.2024 - 100% (n=17), 2023- 83% (n=12), 2022 - 84% (n=19), 2021 - 95% (n=22). In 2022 and 2023, the student's ability to alter their positioning and recommend corrective actions were noted to be trending downwards. In 2024, the trend increased markedly. The faculty believes that this increase is due, at least in part, to curricular changes and enhancement of the laboratory experience."The greater emphasis on trauma skills in labs and clinical assignments has demonstrated an increase in the students skills and abilities during trauma exams. With further enrichment of the lab experience and having a single, full-time lab instructor should strengthen these skills further.In 2024, 100% of employer respondents (n=6) indicated that they agreed or strongly agreed that program graduates they employ exercise independent judgement and discretion in performing medical imaging.Percent of employer respondents that "strongly agree" with question 8: 2024 - 100% (n=6), 2023 - 100% (n=4), 2021 - 100% (n=4), 2019: 100% (n=2). In the last four survey cycles, the percent of employers that strongly agree with question 8 has remained consistently high. However, the low response rate was noted and employers were asked to provide survey responses during the Advisory Committee meeting or provided the survey in the clinical setting. The response rate increased in 2024, but with many of the program's graduates finding employment at a small number of sites, the number of responses appears low.MIn 2022 and 2024, one student in each class did not receive a grade of 85% or higher. The course adjunct instructor has changed over the years and the current full-time instructor has implemented a greater emphasis on verbal commumication in the class. He is stressing communication and persentation skills throughout the semester.The student's have consistently demonstrated excellent communication skills with the clinical staff. In 2023, one student rated a 2 out of three on question 2 of the Weekly Evaluation. The Clinical Preceptor has worked with this student to more effectively communicate with the clinical staff. Subsequently, there has been a marked improvement in the student's communication skills with the clinical staff.Percent of graduates indicating a desire to further their education: 2024: 50% (n=8), 2023: 38% (n=8), 2022: 50% (n=8), 2021: 50% (n=2). In 2023, 38% of graduates indicated that they are looking to further their education following graduation. Otherwise, the percent of respondants indicating a desire to further their education has remained consistent for the last 4 years. These data may be effected by the small sample sizes.None needed at this time. Annual assessment of pass rates will continue and necessity of action determined accordingly based upon established benchmark.None needed at this time. Trending of pass rates over 5 year period will continue and necessity of action determined accordingly based upon established benchmark.DIn 2023, the graduates received scores that were within 0.1 points of the national average in 7 of 8 sections o<} f the ARRT National Certifying Exam. In the section "Patient Interactions and Management" the graduates averaged a score of 7.9 and the national average was 8.2. See Ƶ ARRT Exam Results documents for 2019-2023.VBenchmark met, however, rewording of the measure of satisfaction Question #14 for clarity is an area of opportunity for improvement identified through this review. On the survey for the 2024 graduates, Question #14 was reworded to read: "How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the overall quality and effectiveness of the program?"Benchmark met for survey respondents; however, the low survey response rate in 2020 and 2021 was identified as an area to improve. In 2022, graduates accessible to clinical coordinator in local clinical facilities, were hand-delivered the survey and reminded of the importance of survey completion, Since 2022, the survey response rate has improved and the program will endeavor to continue this trend.-The program meets this goal. Along with verbal information gathered at the Advisory Committee meeting, data indicated that employers are satisfied with how well the graduates are prepared as an entry-level technologist. However, employer survey response rate was reviewed and the number of graduates currently employed by each employer was compared and it was identified that multiple graduates have historically been employed by the same employers in our region. Thus a low response rate for this particular survey does refect data for multiple graduates.Completion rates: 2024 - 61% (17 of 28), 2023 - 92% (12 of 13), 2022 - 90% (19 of 21), 2021, 96.5% (22 of 23), 2020 - 68.4% (13 of 18)wIn 2024, 61% of students (17 of 28) completed the program. The five-year average completion rate is 79.6% (82 of 103).The program meets it's goal with a 79.6% completion rate average for five years. In 2024, there was a noticeable decline in the program completion rate. This can be attributed to the failure of 7 students in RTE 1523 (Positioning 3) in the summer 2024 semester. During that semester, the instructor changed from an inexperienced one for Positioning 1 and 2; to an instructor with numerous years of experience. Four of the failing students have returned to the program and are expected to graduate in 2025.Completion rates: 2024 - 61% (16 of 28), 2023 - 92% (12 of 13), 2022 - 90% (19 of 21), 2021 - 96.5% (22 of 23), 2021 - 68.4% (13 of 18).2024 - 100% of graduates (n=17) passed the ARRT Certification exam on the first attempt 2023- 92% of graduates (n=12) passed the ARRT Certification Exam on the first attempt. 2022- 100% of graduates (n=19) passed the ARRT Certification Exam on the first attempt. 2021- 95% of graduates (n=22) passed the ARRT Certification Exam on the first attempt. 2020- 100% of graduates (n=13) passed the ARRT Certification Exam on the first attempt.j5 6H890;=n@? &C FfJ^O]bTXNO\e?mq<w z 73ccB ZO 3c  dMbP?_*+%&?'?(?)?M\\lee-prtsrv\LE-A110-IMC60002B  odXX10DRu-zxWɒ6 'U,L_5'EBpq' R2SKL< s  4kp KIe=CRiOr2]/-Ʃa^I]i1 ;_{h~,C|8:ZZ}`Z0'ROTFSLjt߹qtTn*Qx`"[a XTRЉV{3 8!CM0':HwˈNZ#xDS$LIOQw7,P1+ w}=`jƯ;v@1J!0/C#,6)3Yh9{_ZZ2ʰa[kuxҍL=#OY+p&/?gFTq janvR:jڥ(t?L()x>أV #F,# &XF=![c*%ݘT-$J?I/`F,825QK(5voR/߾w tqDǯ>CK"0_s=1dfJp|%Ź|m֏/'gμqk(, 9F >A,b/沲煦њej/*a n'$M_*zؘfm-*hVN>EԦɎ#q(!ݸ!:;(.㈰=< Θkx}RMO0 +Sb&>IHh)k.ZbV#t9g?r{u^#Wˊn*w)! %k 'Z_kaơ(,Z?z2t04V7¤y\/phˊA ul]V;b&2QipAì썬 ܛ4Csܻ(m 9((Op9c@qa늼IZ)JuIJl6IF5S}7Ր!FPF}#';{yޝ+SDBO.|ikmdSkl%tlV|2"7XX333333?333333?&43U} U} } } } !} 8(} qH} /3@@@@@ U@L @  @ x @ x @  h  ,@4 @@\ @ h (0@ @ @ @ h  @ @ G EF G EF GD GD B S T T T T U! V" Z {c A4 A Zd Ae ZA Af Z5 Z Zg Zh Zi Z6 Z' Z7 Z ZP Z A Z AK A A AQ AR A @ @@@@@@ j @@@@@@@ B8 S T T T T U! V" \k ] _9 J _s ^ `tN A: A; A AS A M L AL AO A AT RM MNQ P= P> P a a b@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ B W X X X X d! e" I ]U J? J Ju cm ZL ZV Z@ A Zl [n Z [ fA ZW ZB Z< oq pp qrO aC aD Z< rX sY t@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ B S T T T T d! Y" \& ]F J J y{ zG K| L AE A A {x |y MzD lbb^bh$bb^b^bbhb^bb!< @ " @ #% &'\@(P@) @*@+@, -@.|@/@0@1 @2 @ !LH !A} !A~ !A !A !A !b"O "P "PI "P "P "g "b#@@@@@@@ %C &h &i &i &i &i &i! &n" 'f( 'Z) 'Z* 'A 'Z 'Z, 'j(L (Z+ (A* (A (ZZ (Z (j)L )Z\ )A[ )Z )Z )Z] )jo *L *Z- *Z` *A *A^ *Z_ *j+u +} +}. +v +}a +}b +w ,J, -~ -^ -^/ -_ -^ -^ -- .L .A0 .Z/ .A .Z . .j. A /L /A# /A1 /A /l /x /j/ m0L 0H 0A1 0A 0x 0xv 0jw0 m 1L 1A$ 1Z2 1A 1Z 1Z 1j1 Z 2k% 2a 2a3 2P 2a 2a 2b2 a&@b^bb^^b^$lhlhl>$@FHJ '''7ggD Oh+'0HP`x jmayhewJames MayhewMicrosoft Excel@tR/@Ar#@_ ՜.+,0, PXp x Edison College 2024 Rad. Assessment Plan''2024 Rad. Assessment Plan'!Print_Area  Worksheets Named Ranges  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdfghijklnopqrstRoot Entry F _zWorkbookSummaryInformation(eDocumentSummaryInformation8m